http://www.the-book-of-mormon.com/photo-proofs.html


Most of these have been discussed and debunked here on ARM.  Stan Larson's book
"Quest for the Gold Plates" refutes many of them.

It's amusing that the very first "proof" mentioned was the Bat Creek stone,
when it has been debunked for years now.  Same with the Ica Stones, supposed
pictographs of elephants, and the "cocaine mummies."

The problem is that the Mormon apologists  who put stuff like this on websites
refuse to accept their debunking, and refuse to remove the bogus material.  As
a result, year after year naive Mormons go to those sites and believe that the
material is legitimate.

No one can force Mopologists to remove that material, but the fact that they
don't reveals a lot about their honesty.

Randy J.